Radiometric dating answers
They also allow us to compare rock units in different areas of the world to find which ones formed at the same time.
Furthermore, if physicists examine why the same rocks yield different dates, they may discover new clues about the unusual behavior of radioactive elements during the past.
PART 1: Radiometric Dating: Back to Basics PART 2: Radiometric Dating: Problems with the Assumptions PART 3: Making Sense of the Patterns This three-part series will help you properly understand radiometric dating, the assumptions that lead to inaccurate dates, and the clues about what really happened in the past.
Part Two of this series showed that the same rocks can yield very different ages, depending on which radiometric dating technique you use.
Does this mean we should throw out the radioactive clocks? The general principles of using radioisotopes to date rocks are sound; it’s just that the assumptions have been wrong and led to exaggerated dates.
While the clocks cannot yield absolute dates for rocks, they can provide relative ages that allow us to compare any two rock units and know which one formed first.
For example, uranium will radioactively decay through a series of steps until it becomes the stable element lead. The original element is referred to as the parent element (in these cases uranium and potassium), and the end result is called the daughter element (lead and argon).
Since God is the Creator of all things (including science), and His Word is true (“), the true age of the earth must agree with His Word.
After all, textbooks, media, and museums glibly present ages of millions of years as fact.
The straightforward reading of Scripture reveals that the days of creation () were literal days and that the earth is just thousands of years old and not billions.
There appears to be a fundamental conflict between the Bible and the reported ages given by radioisotope dating.